Sarah assumes Beth's identity and occupation as a police detective after Beth's death. During the first season, Sarah discovers that she is a clone, that she has many 'sister' clones spread throughout North America and Europe that are all part of an illegal human cloning experiment, and that someone is plotting to kill them and her. Alongside her foster brother, Felix Dawkins, and two of her fellow clones, Alison Hendrix and Cosima Niehaus, Sarah discovers the origin of the clones:
Atheism and Christianity Deism vs. This is what we are doing when we believe in any revealed religion, and that's all Christianity is. It's a revealed religion like many others such as Islam and Judaism.
Revealed religion gets dangerous however, when it crosses over the line into politics. This is the admitted goal of the Christian Coalition. God allegedly revealed to Pat Robertson and his Coalition, that He wants them to take over America and eventually the world with "His What the waters revealed essay so the laws of the nations will mirror the laws in the Bible, which, if you know what's in the Bible, is terrifying.
This, too, is what the Ayatollah's goal was, only his "revealed word of God" was the Koran, an other revelation. Are we to believe Pat when he says the Bible is revelation of God's Word?
If you're not currently a subscriber, please click here.
Our reverence to God demands that we do this, lest we ascribe to God what is not His, and our duty to ourselves demands it lest we take fable for fact, and rest our hope of salvation on a false foundation.
Inquiry therefore is necessary in order to arrive at truth. But inquiry must have some principle to proceed on, some standard to judge by, superior to human authority.
No one part contradicts another. The sun does not run against the moon, nor the moon against the sun, nor the planets against each other. Everything keeps its appointed time and place.
He sees the God of order in every part of the visible universe. His opinion is like a feather in the scale compared with the standard that God Himself has set up. This belief has absolutely nothing to do with revealed religion. The priests, ministers, and rabbis need to suppress, or at least complicate, the pure and simple belief and realization of Deism for their own job security.
And the power elites have no use for Deism because they can't use Deism to "inspire" mankind to wage war against itself for the elitists' own selfish purposes. The following quote from Thomas Jefferson points us in a direction free of the confusion of priest-craft and revealed religion: The movements of the heavenly bodies, so exactly held in their course by the balance of centrifugal and centripetal forces; the structure of the Earth itself, with its distribution of lands, waters and atmosphere; animal and vegetable bodies, examined in all their minutest particles; insects, mere atoms of life, yet as perfectly organized as man or mammoth; the mineral substances, their generation and uses, it is impossible, I say, for the human mind not to believe, that there is in all this, design, cause and effect, up to an ultimate cause, a Fabricator of all things from matter and motion, their Preserver and Regulator, while permitted to exist in their present forms, and their regeneration into new and other forms.
We see, too, evident proofs of the necessity of a superintending power, to maintain the universe in its course and order. That instead, God can only be brought about by rationalization. The book describes rationality as first finding evidence, then arriving at the idea, like Newton seeing the apple fall to the ground and then discovering the law of gravity.
It then describes rationalization as first accepting an idea and then searching for evidence to support it, like someone inventing the idea of God and then saying God created the universe.
Deism says it is rationality and reason that leads to God.
To the Deist, the evidence is the creation and the idea of what brought about the evidence is the Creator. There is absolutely nothing known to man that created itself. For example, if someone shows us a computer, and tells us that all the individual parts that make up the computer just came about by chance, that they somehow just formed into a perfectly working computer system all by themselves, we would be foolish to believe that person.
Reason, if we use it, won't let us believe a statement like that. Likewise, if someone tells us the ever growing creation and its perfect order "happened" by pure chance, we are under no obligation to believe them. From our own experience we know everything created has a creator. Why then should the creation itself be different?
There is, however, one quality the creation has that makes leaving its existence to chance even more remote.
That quality is motion.
Turning again to Thomas Paine we find the following pertinent observation he made regarding atheism in a speech to the Society of Theophilanthropists in Paris, France, shortly after the French Revolution: To this they will answer, that matter possessed those properties eternally.
This is not solution, but assertion; and to deny it is as impossible of proof as to assert it. Motion is not a property of matter, and without this motion, the solar system could not exist. Were motion a property of matter, that undiscovered and undiscoverable thing called perpetual motion would establish itself.
|Religion and domestic violence: the missing link||There are many who talk about the love of God, who are total strangers to the God of love.|
When the pretenders to atheism can produce perpetual motion, and not till then, they may expect to be credited. Motion, or change of place, is the effect of an external cause acting upon matter.
As to that faculty of matter that is called gravitation, it is the influence which two or more bodies have reciprocally on each other to unite and be at rest.
Everything which has hitherto been discovered, with respect to the motion of the planets in the system, relates only to the laws by which motion acts, and not to the cause of motion.Analyze how the author used classical principles of argumentation-ethos,pathos, and logos-in his or her essay, and how these principles relate to authority in the essay"What the Waters Revealed.".
I like the faith message that I get out of the "literary device" viewpoint. My only minor quibble is that the order of Genesis 1 is close enough to the natural scientific order. Introduction. For those who believe there is a God, we all agree on one thing: God is love.
And the love of God is a biblical truth (1 John ). But why is everyone so eager to embrace this attribute, unlike many other of God’s attributes? Isn’t it odd that almost all the foods we eat are marked with the Kosher Seal? The “K” stands for “Kosher” and the “U inside a Circle” stands for the “Union of Orthodox Congregations” both indicating that the foods we eat comply with Jewish dietary laws.
With a rabbi present. Answer to How does the author use ethos, pathos, and logos in what the waters revealed essay? Aug 02, · The Food Network can now be seen in nearly million American homes and on most nights commands more viewers than any of the cable news channels.